Lucy Bronze achieves visual freedom with the EVO implantable lenses
Soccer Player
Soccer Player
Vision struggles on and off the field
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Life Changing
Off the pitch
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Questions With Lucy
What do you do for a living?
I am a professional footballer, playing league, European and international games.
How long have you had problems with your vision?
I first discovered that I needed glasses when I was about 9 years old. I was often losing or breaking my glasses while playing football. When I became a teenager I began wearing contact lenses for when I was playing sport.
What’s your biggest pain point about wearing contacts?
I had quite a few problems with contact lenses, as any contact lens wearer will tell you, after a few hours of wear you start to feel irritated, dry eyes, rubbing you eyes, you’re waiting to get home so can finally take your lenses out and put your glasses on for a moment. It’s like when you take you shoes off at home and get to put your feet up, that was that feeling of I get to take my lenses out finally. Not to mention the worry that a lens might fall out during a game, which actually happened during a league game.
What about EVO ICL helped make your decision?
EVO is a revolutionary procedure that doesn’t use lasers and works in harmony with my natural eye, it’s a revisable lens implant, so if ever necessary the lenses can be removed by my consultant. When I found out that the EVO lens that’s implanted can be removed, I thought if my eyesight does change with age I had the option to do things with that and being in control with those type of things when it comes to my eyes really appealed to me. EVO is designed to be a permanent vision correction solution, no daily maintenance or periodical replacement is required. But, if for any reason, there is a need or desire to have it removed, a consultant can do that. Having that flexibility for the future provided me with the peace of mind I needed to make the decision. EVO is additive, doesn’t remove any corneal tissue with lasers, so in complete harmony with my natural eye – my eye is still the same, my eye.
이보 ICL로 시력의 자유를 되찾을 준비가 되셨나요? 지금 내 주변에 상담 가능한 안과를 찾아보세요.
주요 안전성 정보
이보 ICL은 -0.5 디옵터 ~ -18.0 디옵터의 근시를 효과적으로 교정하고, 이보 Toric ICL은 -0.5 디옵터 ~ -18.0 디옵터의 근시를 교정함과 동시에 0.5 디옵터 ~ 6.0 디옵터의 난시를 교정합니다.
이 범위의 근시가 있는 경우, 이보 ICL 렌즈삽입술은 안경이나 콘택트 렌즈 없이 원거리 시력을 향상시킬 수 있습니다. 이보 ICL 렌즈삽입술은 원거리 시력을 교정하기 때문에 돋보기의 필요성이 없어지는 것은 아닙니다. 돋보기를 이전에 사용한 적이 없더라도 언젠가 필요해질 수 있습니다.
이보 ICL 렌즈삽입술은 외과적 절차이므로 잠재적으로 심각한 위험이 따를 수 있습니다. 안과 전문의와 잠재적 위험에 대해 상담하십시오. 드물기는 하지만 합병증에는 추가 수술, 염증, 각막 뒷면의 세포 손실, 안압 상승, 백내장이 포함될 수 있습니다.
다음과 같은 경우 이보 ICL 렌즈삽입술을 받지 않아야 합니다.
- 안과 의사가 귀하의 눈 모양이 이보 ICL 렌즈삽입술에 적합하지 않다고 결정한 경우
- 귀하가 임신 중이거나 수유 중인 경우
- 렌즈삽입술 당시, 안과 의사가 귀하 연령대의 최소 내피세포밀도를 충족하지 않는다고 결정한 경우
- 안과 의사가 귀하의 시력이 안정적이지 않다고 결정한 경우
이보 ICL 렌즈삽입술을 고려하기 전 눈 검사를 받고 이보 ICL 렌즈삽입술, 특히 잠재적인 장점, 위험 및 합병증에 대해 안과 전문의와 상담해야 합니다. 수술 후 회복에 필요한 시간을 상의해야 합니다. 잠재적인 장점, 위험 및 합병증에 대한 추가 정보는 홈페이지를 참조하십시오.
국가 또는 지역 선택
Latin America
참고자료
Home - 광고심의필: 조합-2022-04-030 (유효기간: 2025.02.07)
1. Gonzalo Carracedo, et al. The role of dinucleoside polyphosphates on the ocular surface and other eye structures. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016 Nov;55:182-205. 2. Paul J Dougherty, et al. Refractive outcomes and safety of the implantable collamer lens in young low-to-moderate myopes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:273–277. 3. Gregory D. Parkhurst, et al. Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation in United States Military Warfighters: A Retrospective Analysis of Early Clinical Outcomes of the EVO ICL. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(7);473-481. 4. Feingold et al. Biocompatible, optically transparent, ultraviolet light absorbing, polymeric material based upon collagen and method of making. USPTO June 8, 1999. 5. ICL in Treatment of Myopia (ITM) Study Group. Postoperative Inflammation after Implantation of the Implantable Contact Lens. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2335-2341. 6. Steven Schallhorn, MD et al. Night Driving Simulation in a Randomized Prospective Comparison of Visian Toric Implantable Collamer Lenses and Conventional PRK for Moderate to High Myopic Astigmatism. Journal of Refractive Surgery Vol.26, No. 5, 2010:321-326 7. Gregory D Parkhurst. A prospective comparison of phakic collamer lenses and wavefront-optimized laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia. Clinical Ophthalmology 2016;10:1209-1215. 8. Donald R Sanders et al. United States Food and Drug Administration Clinical Trial of the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) for Moderate to High Myopia Three-Year Follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1683–1692. 9. Elena Martines-plaze, et al. Effect of the EVO + Visian Phakic Implantable Collamer Lens on Visual Performance and Quality of Vision and Life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;226:117-125. 10. Data on file. STAAR Surgical Annual Report.
이보 ICL이란? - 광고심의필: 조합-2022-04-031 (유효기간: 2025.02.07)
1. Feingold et al. Biocompatible, optically transparent, ultraviolet light absorbing, polymeric material based upon collagen and method of making. USPTO June 8, 1999. 2. ICL in Treatment of Myopia (ITM) Study Group. Postoperative Inflammation after Implantation of the Implantable Contact Lens. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2335-2341. 3. Risto J. Uusitalo, et al. Implantable contact lens for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002(28):29-36. 4. Gregory D. Parkhurst, et al. Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation in United States Military Warfighters: A Retrospective Analysis of Early Clinical Outcomes of the EVO ICL. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(7);473-481. 5. FDA. Before, During & After Surgery. https://www.fda.gov/medical-de... (as of 2021-12-24) 6. 윤재문 외. 난시교정용 후방 유수정체 안내렌즈 삽입술의 단기간 임상성적. 대한안과학회지. 2009;50(6):839-851. 7. Steven Schallhorn, MD et al. Night Driving Simulation in a Randomized Prospective Comparison of Visian Toric Implantable Collamer Lenses and Conventional PRK for Moderate to High Myopic Astigmatism. Journal of Refractive Surgery Vol.26, No. 5, 2010:321-326. 8. Gregory D Parkhurst. A prospective comparison of phakic collamer lenses and wavefront-optimized laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia. Clinical Ophthalmology 2016;10:1209-1215. 9. Donald R Sanders et al. United States Food and Drug Administration Clinical Trial of the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) for Moderate to High Myopia Three-Year Follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1683–1692.
이보 ICL의 장점(야간시력 개선) - 광고심의필: 조합-2022-04-032 (유효기간: 2025.02.07)
1. Steven Schallhorn, MD et al. Night Driving Simulation in a Randomized Prospective Comparison of Visian Toric Implantable Collamer Lenses and Conventional PRK for Moderate to High Myopic Astigmatism. Journal of Refractive Surgery Vol.26, No. 5, 2010:321-326. 2. Gregory D Parkhurst. A prospective comparison of phakic collamer lenses and wavefront-optimized laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia. Clinical Ophthalmology 2016;10:1209-1215. 3. Donald R Sanders et al. United States Food and Drug Administration Clinical Trial of the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) for Moderate to High Myopia Three-Year Follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1683–1692. 4. FDA. Before, During & After Surgery. https://www.fda.gov/medical-de... (as of 2021-12-24) 5. 윤재문 외. 난시교정용 후방 유수정체 안내렌즈 삽입술의 단기간 임상성적. 대한안과학회지. 2009;50(6):839-851.
이보 ICL의 장점(안구건조증이 걱정되세요?) - 광고심의필: 조합-2022-04-033 (유효기간: 2025.02.08)
1. Gregory D. Parkhurst, et al. Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation in United States Military Warfighters: A Retrospective Analysis of Early Clinical Outcomes of the EVO ICL. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(7);473-481. 2. FDA. Before, During & After Surgery. https://www.fda.gov/medical-de... (as of 2021-12-24). 3. 윤재문 외. 난시교정용 후방 유수정체 안내렌즈 삽입술의 단기간 임상성적. 대한안과학회지. 2009;50(6):839-851.
이보 ICL의 장점(마치 내 눈 같은 편안함) - 광고심의필: 조합-2022-04-029 (유효기간: 2025.02.03)
1. FDA. Before, During & After Surgery. https://www.fda.gov/medical-de... (as of 2021-12-24). 2. 윤재문 외. 난시교정용 후방 유수정체 안내렌즈 삽입술의 단기간 임상성적. 대한안과학회지. 2009;50(6):839-851.
수술 과정 - 광고심의필: 조합-2022-04-034 (유효기간: 2025.02.03)
1. FDA. Before, During & After Surgery. https://www.fda.gov/medical-de... (as of 2021-12-24) 2. 윤재문 외. 난시교정용 후방 유수정체 안내렌즈 삽입술의 단기간 임상성적. 대한안과학회지. 2009;50(6):839-851. 3. Elena Martines-plaze, et al. Effect of the EVO + Visian Phakic Implantable Collamer Lens on Visual Performance and Quality of Vision and Life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;226:117-125. 4. Data on file. STAAR Surgical Annual Report.
자주 묻는 질문 - 광고심의필: 조합-2022-04-035 (유효기간: 2025.02.03)
1. Feingold et al. Biocompatible, optically transparent, ultraviolet light absorbing, polymeric material based upon collagen and method of making. USPTO June 8, 1999. 2. ICL in Treatment of Myopia (ITM) Study Group. Postoperative Inflammation after Implantation of the Implantable Contact Lens. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2335-2341. 3. Risto J. Uusitalo, et al. Implantable contact lens for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002(28):29-36. 4. Elena Martines-plaze, et al. Effect of the EVO + Visian Phakic Implantable Collamer Lens on Visual Performance and Quality of Vision and Life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;226:117-125.
개인정보 수집 및 이용
이보 ICL 브로슈어 발송을 위한 최소한의 개인정보를 수집하고 이용합니다.
수집된 정보는 이메일 발송 외 다른 목적으로 이용되지 않으며, 서비스가 종료되거나 구독을 해지할 경우 즉시 파기됩니다.